Yes, I agree. As usual, I too am 'IANAL'.
Marty
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sun Dec 25 23:52:27 2005
To: Hannigan, Martin
Cc: Dave Pooser; NANOG
Subject: Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om>, "Hannigan, Martin" writes:
>
>Dave, RIAA wins almost 100pct vs p2p'ers ir sues. Its an interesting =
>dichotomy.
>
"Wins" is too strong a word, since I don't think any have gone to
court -- see http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Music-Download-Suit.html
as my source.
Besides, it's a very different situation. For my take on liability
issues -- note that I'm not a lawyer, and note that this is from 1994
-- see http://www.wilyhacker.com/1e/chap12.pdf
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Title: Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Steven M. Bellovin
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Barry Shein
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Paul Vixie
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Florian Weimer
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Matthew Sullivan
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Owen DeLong
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Hannigan, Martin
- RE: Compromised machines liable for damage? Owen DeLong
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Compromised machines liable for damage... Owen DeLong
- Re: Compromised machines liable for da... Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Compromised machines liable f... Jason Frisvold
- Re: Compromised machines liab... JC Dill
- Re: Compromised machines ... Jason Frisvold