On 27-Jan-2006, at 11:54, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems to me that certified validation of prefix ownership and as
path are the only real way out of these problems that does not
teach us the 42 reasons we use a *dynamic* protocol.
Wouldn't a well-operated network of IRRs used by 95% of
network operators be able to meet all three of your
requirements?
Maybe I missed something, but didn't Verio say the prefix was in
their internal registry, and that's why it was accepted.
Perhaps by "well-operated", Michael was referring to something like
the hierarchical authentication scheme used by the RIPE database,
which ultimately provides access control for route objects using RIR
allocation/assignment data?
Joe
