Edward B. DREGER wrote:
PJ> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:33 +0000 (GMT)
PJ> From: Paul Jakma
PJ> Well you don't need to assign an ASN for Cox and SBC to announce a shared
PJ> prefix for a start off.
Technically true, but administratively not feasible. Coordinating
private ASNs would be similar to coordining RFC1918 space between
different entities, although it's definitely a nice goal.
I'd say you already fail at coordinating Cox and SBC before any link
is up and prefixes get announced. I bet they can't even agree on which
of them writes the prefix and ASN application to ARIN.
$realworld always wins.
--
Andre
