Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

[David Barak]

--- Tony Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Consider that the IETF
> *could* conceivably
> require every compliant v6 implementation to include
> it.  

God Forbid.  I somehow don't want my core routers
deciding to speak shim6...


David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com