> michael, all,
[ if you can't use procmail, could you at least respond to non-ops
trolls on the nanog-futures list? ]
but todd, you have a bit of clue. do you have a clue at all
regarding the question i asked on-list the other day?
what is the security policy that isc plans to use over the
content of the isc dlv registry? and how will the dvl trust
key roll-over and revocation be handled?
if the above can not be very clearly answered (by isc?), then this
proposal is techno-political hubris at best.
randy
