> i really would rather talk about DLV than "meeting manners."
cool! or we should at least take meeting manners and registration
policies over to nanog-futures.
but, if you want to talk about dlv, could you answer my questions?
what is the security policy that isc plans to use over the
content of the isc dlv registry? and how will the dvl trust
key roll-over and revocation be handled?
as providing a tld key registry is tantamount to emulating the
root key responsibilities of the iana, potential users should
be rather concerned.
randy
