On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:10:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > > As pointed out by Rob Seastrom in private email, RFC2182 addresses things > > of biblical proportions - such as dispersion of nameservers geographically > > and topologically. Having 3 secondaries, only one of them on separate /24, > > and none of them on topologically different network does not qualify. > ... > > > ns1.register.com. 600 IN A 216.21.234.96 > ns2.register.com. 600 IN A 216.21.226.96 > ns3.register.com. 600 IN A 216.21.234.97 > ns4.register.com. 600 IN A 216.21.226.97 > > I am not saying that register.com IS doing this, just that you can't say > that they're NOT just from this evidence.
I think Alex could have included a few lines of traceroute to these hosts showing that they all end behind: 7 tbr1-p014001.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.123.8.98) 9.754 ms 9.685 ms 9.608 ms 8 tbr1-cl4.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.30) 29.708 ms 29.593 ms 33.498 ms 9 12.122.85.178 (12.122.85.178) 36.300 ms 28.558 ms 28.521 ms So... it sorta looks like both /24's are behind something in StLouis, Missouri ( to me atleast ).
