On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 07:49:40AM +0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:25:13AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>> i know its all the rage to post/shame the offending parties (those
> >>> whois filtering policies don't reflect our own)
> >> bull
> >>
> >> we are trying to validate experimental results. sorry if that
> >> offends you or you do your research result validation differently.
> >>
> >
> > none taken... although "name/shame" as a technique for
> > validating experimetnal results is a tried & ture method,
> > an equally valid technique is to look in the other direction
> > and praise/name those whose practices match your expected
> > results. ... i'd prefer to see the full curve, not just the
> > sigma-six folks on the left side.
>
> your issues might be better based if you knew anything about what was
> happening instead of shooting off mouth in dark.
>
> as i already said, but somehow you missed. preso will be this afternoon
> (gmt+8). i will try to post a pointer here.
>
> randy
your interpersonal skills are improving.
will be interesting in the reported progress of your experiments.
--bill (gmt+10)
