On Apr 1, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
Reacting to new domains after the fact is often too late.
What happens when they're wrong?
And who's 'they', btw? What qualifications must 'they' have? And
what happens if a registrar disagrees with 'them'? Or when 'they'
are instructed by their governments to objection to a domain because
of its perceived lack of redeeming social value, or somesuch?
It seems to me as if we've just talked through the
institutionalization of the Department of Domain Pre-Crime, with all
that entails. It could be argued that the proposed solution might be
worse than the problem it's purporting to solve.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // 408.527.6376 voice
Words that come from a machine have no soul.
-- Duong Van Ngo
