On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Durand, Alain wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > 1) What is the IPv6 'service'?
> > > For example, is it reasonable to define a 'basic' level
> > > service as web+mail and an 'extended' service as
> > everything else?
> > >
> >
> > actually, for some of us there is the thought that before
> > the "basic" service of web+email can work at all, one needs
> > to have a couple of other infrastructure pieces in play,
> > namely DNS and NTP... Oh, and the routing to knit these
> > services together.
>
> Sure, this is very important... but I was talking about the "user
> experience".
>
> - Alain.
good point. there are "levels" of basic services.
i suspect that the network operations folks would want
to have working viable v6 (naming, timestamps, audit,
measurement) running -before- turning up production
"basic" service for the "user experience".
assuming that is the case, what things to these assembled
operators think are critical for operational stability
in bringing online a new address family?
Randy had a non-exaustive list at the last IEPG. To memory:
MIB, AAAA, DNS, NTP, SYSLOG, DHCP, RADIUS,
CALEA, etc.
--bill
