On 9 Oct 2007, at 18:48, Leo Vegoda wrote:
On 9 Oct 2007, at 17:47, Andy Davidson wrote:
However, if a different third-party network then sweeps up their
routing table by looking to remove more specifics that seem
'spoofed' using IRR data, the routes you intend to push onto the
internet may well start to disappear from their perspective.
I don't think this should be possible if the database implements
RPSS (RFC 2725) properly. I believe that it should only be possible
to create a more specific route object with the agreement using
whatever PGP/X.509 security you like if you have used mnt-lower and
mnt-routes attributes as appropriate.
mnt-lower works, but only if I know someone else wants to originate a
more specific. Routing in general doesn't care - this was the case I
was making - hope I didn't cause confusion.
Andy
