Leo Vegoda wrote: > On 19 Dec 2007, at 21:31, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > [...] > >> When an ISP is not going to provide /48's to endusers then RIPE NCC >> should revoke the IPv6 prefix they received as they are not following >> the reasons why they received the prefix for. > > They received the prefix because they had a plan. That's all, a plan. > Not a promise.
It is not a plan, it is justification. The 200-rule has been taken out of the allocation already. And based on the x customers times /48, they justified that they will need a /20 or something else. As such when they are going to give out /56's, they suddenly need 256 times as many customers and unless they are going to grow insanely (for a /32 from ~60k to 15m customers) they won't be able to justify their address space anymore. As such, keep it simple folks, just pass out /48's. Greets, Jeroen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
