On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:43:15PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
[snip]
> Too bad the PC hasn't solicited a talk in this area. They ought to.
Too bad that the collective-we choose to beat up the PC for not
providing agenda information in advance, and then change tack
to beat them up when the increased transparency of incremental
information for confirmed talks doesn't cover current timely
issues such as earthquake impact or regulatory vagaries. Rather
than assuming, suggestions for ways to provide insight to
agenda works-in-progress would be useful.
Joe
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
