They're not points, Alex. They should be agenda items.
On Nov 14, 2007 7:13 PM, Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Marty, I'll bring both points up. > > -alex > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > We should be able to see subscribers to admins so that we know who is > > on the list. Can we get a current listing so that we can see who is > > receiving our mail? > > > > We should also use Merit's conference bridge if it's toll-free. We pay > > for this stuff through our fees so we should not be tied to a members > > service since it could be disrupted if that person does not attend or > > is no longer on the MLC. > > > > Also, proposals > > > > Meeting Etiquette: > > > > Roberts Rules of Order > > Quorum: 51% or more, depending upon membership make up. > > Required to hold official Meeting: majority of voting members (4 as of > > current) > > > > > > > > 1. Adding people to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > When an individual is being proposed to be added to the MLC mailing > > list, the proppsal will be discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the event > > of any objection, the issue will be discussed and voted on at the next > > MLC call. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Admins mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > >
