Folks, Let's bring this one to closure. The authors question is answered and this is backing itself into an endless thread with arguments better suited for the IETF vs. NANOG.
Best Regards, Martin Hannigan NANOG Mailing List Committee On Jan 4, 2008 1:02 PM, Alexander Harrowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 4, 2008 5:52 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I completely agree. If it weren't for that philosophy, we wouldn't > > have an email problem at all. > > > > A > > > > Because....we wouldn't have e-mail? Consider the pain of getting worldwide > interoperability for a "notmail" system that insisted on strict > validation... > >
