On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Roger Marquis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I'd point out that FastFlux is actually sort of how Akamai does
it's job (inconsistent dns responses)
That's not really fast flux. FF uses TTLs of just a few seconds with
dozens of NS. Also, in practice, most FF NS are invalid. Not that FF has
a fixed definition...
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.yahoo.com. 24 IN CNAME www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net.
www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net. 57 IN A 69.147.76.15
akamai, 60 second TTL's... most of the FF things I've seen sit around
300seconds for NS and for A records. either way, this is 60 seconds
which is fast enough.
Interesting, I was under the impression anything less than 120 is
effectively as good as 120.
Gadi.
