On Sun, 6 Jul 2008, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Lynda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, that's not a bad idea. Of course, there's the larger problem;
verifying that the address space previously sullied is now worthy of being
cleaned up. In Nick Shank's case (and Bravo! to Nick), I would say that he's
off doing the right thing. It would seem that some serious investigation
would be necessary before acting as a third party for others in a similar
boat, of course.
There's already a bunch of companies that have built up a business
model on this.. they call it "deliverability"
There's a big difference though between trying to clean up the reputation
of newly acquired IP space a previous "owner" abused and trying to explain
away an ESP's prior spamming. My limited experience with deliverability
consulting companies recently has largely been the latter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
