On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:12:31PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > That said, they should have dropped Esthost before it got that big, but > they didn't.
Didn't you notice that the quoted material was from *three years ago*? And this problem didn't begin three years ago, either. For example: > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 5 09:53:14 EST 2003 > Article: 1141964 of news.admin.net-abuse.email > From: furio ercolessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email > Subject: AS27595 (Atrivo) here no more > Date: 5 Dec 2003 09:29:30 GMT > Organization: Spin Internetworking > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > NNTP-Posting-Host: photon.spin.it > > After several months of spam support including routing of hijacked IP > blocks, without apparent traces of non-abuse related IP traffic, our > backbone is now stopping the exchange of IP packets with AS27595, > currently announcing the following blocks: > > Network DNSBL Upstreams > --------------- ----- ------------------ > 65.124.21.0/24 4474 > 66.250.145.0/24 S2489 22934 > 67.130.99.0/24 4474 > 69.1.78.0/24 S2783 4474, 22934 > 69.31.64.0/20 S2453 4474 > 69.31.76.0/22 S2453 4474, 30371 > 69.50.160.0/20 S2489 4474, 22934, 30371 > 69.50.176.0/20 S2489 4474, 22934, 30371 > > AS4474 Global Village Communication, Inc. > AS22934 E Broadband Now Inc. > AS30371 nLayer Communications, Inc. > > We are currently considering an extension of this measure to the > three entities above, which also seem to appear repeatedly in connection > with network abuses and with very little, if any, legitimate traffic > with our customers. > > furio ercolessi > Spin.it ---Rsk
