I'll make one comment before 'Alex the Hammer' closes this discussion for 
straying into politics. 

Clearly regulating the incumbents to unbundle local loops has worked very well 
in some European countries (France and possibly others). Clearly US financial 
deregulation has cost the world dearly. 

So regulation is the appropriate response in some cases (I hope that is clear 
given the world financial system almost went under a few weeks ago).

However, it is not clear what a well crafted peering regulation would do that 
is different than what the market has achieved already. 

Sensible and hence pragmatic government mandated peering would require 
companies having equal bilateral traffic flows to peer or buy transit from each 
other. That would not necessarily preclude the current peering dispute. 

Forcing companies to peer when it is not in their interest is unlikely to be 
supported by the courts in any country, even the French and German courts.  

Sooner or later these two companies in conflict will either return to peering 
or one of them will buy transit to reach the other. 

It is a short term issue that probably doesn't merit government intervention 

Regards,

Roderick S. Beck
Director of European Sales
Hibernia Atlantic
13-15, rue Sedaine, 75011 Paris
http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com
Wireless: 1-212-444-8829. 
French Landline: 33+1+4355+8224
French Wireless: 33-6-14-33-48-97.
AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.'' Albert 
Einstein. 

Reply via email to