On Wednesday 12 November 2008 21:52:12 Nick Newman wrote: > > Let's compare these two scenarios: > > 1. The world-wide community of people who essentially run the Internet have > had enough with a nasty webhosting company in California. They've > determined that the majority of spam world-wide originates from this > company offering bullet-proof hosting. So they call the upstream providers > and get them cut off.
> 2. Some LE agency serves a search warrant for "any digital evidence" and > collects hundreds of terabytes of worth of data. 5 years later.... These aren't mutually exclusive. > nw3c.org Grr - those stupid DreamWeaver menus that only work in 66% of browsers.
