Certainly, I have seen a perceptual, yet completely subjective increase. I know major operators who have claimed to see a gigantic decrease.
Peter On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Skywing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > McColo hosted the command and control servers for spam botnets and didn't > originate spam directly, at least primarily, according to my understanding. > > - S > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Serwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:49 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: McColo and SPAM > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:34 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:14:08 +0100 >> From: Revolver Onslaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: McColo and SPAM >> To: nanog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hello, >> >> Since McColo closed, we noticed the spam was far more intensive than before. >> >> However, it seems the amount of spam is similar than than before. >> >> Do you feel the same ? >> >> Many thanks, >> RO > > It would seem that the sources of SPAM have merely moved since McColo > was shut down and it's going to > take some time for everyone's blackhole routes and RBL's to catch up. > I have personally noticed a higher > delivered spam content in my own email accounts. > > Peter > > > -- > ピーター > > -- ピーター
