That was my implication...
>-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pstew...@nexicomgroup.net] >Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:50 PM >To: Michael Smith; Charles Regan; nanog@nanog.org >Subject: RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP > >Telebec's only upstream is Bell Canada (AS577) hence why you see >that...;) > >Paul > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Smith [mailto:msm...@internap.com] >Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:34 PM >To: Charles Regan; nanog@nanog.org >Subject: RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP > >I see multiple paths to that block all converge at bell.ca. > >I don't see a route with 35911 (telebec) in the AS_PATH, unless it is >start-of-string and followed by _577_ (bell.ca). > >They seem to be consistent... > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Charles Regan [mailto:charles.re...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 3:23 PM >>To: nanog@nanog.org >>Subject: Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP >> >>Just got final confirmation from ISP1 that they will not do BGP with >us. >> >>ISP1 is Telebec. >>http://www.iptools.com/dnstools.php?tool=ipwhois&user_data=142.217.0.0 & >s >>ubmit=Go >> >>My subnet >>http://www.iptools.com/dnstools.php?tool=ipwhois&user_data=204.144.60. 0 >& >>submit=Go >> >>What can we do now ? Any suggestions ? >> >>Charles > > > > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- - >---- > >"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity >to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged >material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender >immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all >attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank >you."
