feeling cranky, are we, job? (accusing an antispam expert of spamming on a mailing list by having too long a .sig?) but it’s true! anne runs the internet, and the rest of us (except for ICANN GAC representatives) all accept that.
to actually try to make a more substantial point, i am quite curious how the AUPs of carriers try to disallow bandwidth resale while permitting • cybercafe operations and other “free wifi" (where internet service might be provided for patrons in a hotel or cafe) • wireless access point schemes where you make money or get credit for allowing use of your bandwidth (e.g. Fon) • other proxy services that use bandwidth such as tor exit nodes and openvpn gateways i suppose they could just try to disallow resale or allow on-premises use even if revenue is received. the Fon business model seems pretty comparable to me. On Apr 24, 2019, 10:51 PM -0700, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net>, wrote: > Dear Anne, > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:07:51PM -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: > > How can this not be a violation of the ToS of just about every major > > provider? > > Can you perhaps cite ToS excerpts from one or more major providers to > support your assertion? > > > Anne P. Mitchell, > > Attorney at Law > > GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant > > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) > > Legislative Consultant > > CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy > > Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange > > Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > > Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute > > Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center > > California Bar Association > > Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee > > Colorado Cyber Committee > > Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose > > Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > > Are you listing all the above because you are presenting a formal > position supported by all these organisations about ToS? Can you for > instance clarify how signing of as a director for the Denver Internet > Exchange shapes the context of your ToS message? > > Or, perhaps you are listing the above for some kind of self-marketing > purposes? If that is the case, please note that it is fairly uncommon to > use the NANOG mailing list to distribute resumes. I know numerous > websites dedicated to the dissemination of work histories, perhaps you > can use those instead of operational mailling list? > > Regards, > > Job > > ps. RFC 3676 section 4.3