A policy proposal typically is not perfect when submitted.

However, not having the discussion, doesn't allow to improve it and maybe then, 
reach consensus.

It may happen that the end of the discussion is, instead of a group of experts, 
we need something different, or may be a compensation for them  is needed,  or 
instead of a complex policy we need a simple one, in the line of:
"The resources are allocated for the exclusive use of the recipient. 
Consequently, other members can't use them (unless authorized by the legitimate 
resource-holder) and not following this rule is a policy violation".


El 27/4/19 0:08, "Jon Lewis" <[email protected]> escribió:

    On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    
    > The intent is to clearly state that this is a violation of the policies.
    >
    > The membership documents/bylaws or the RSA, your account may be closed. 
    > I looked at it when adapting the policy from RIPE to ARIN, don't have 
    > this information right in my mind, but I'm sure it was there.
    >
    > Otherwise, if needed another policy should state something like "if you 
    > keep violating policies" this and that may happen. This should be 
    > something generic for *any* policy violation not in general. We have 
    > this in RIPE and LACNIC, and I'm also convinced that in APNIC and 
    > AFRINIC (still working on those versions).
    
    Not swip'ing your IPs is also a violation of the agreement, but until you 
    go back to ARIN for more IPs (opps, they're out), that's not an issue.  I 
    see this policy as pointless as written because it doesn't say that ARIN 
    will take any action other than publishing an opinion.  I think you're 
    also assuming there's a pool of experts standing by willing to investigate 
    every alleged hijacking (for free?).  Maybe there are.  If there aren't, 
    or once they get tired of investigating allegations, what then?
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
                                  |  therefore you are
    _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



Reply via email to