PHB? Then make it a cost argument. "If you plan an implement V6 today, will will cost N. If you delay until you discover V6 only services, it will cost 3-5xN to implement quickly, with additional risk of additional costs because quicker implementations are likely to miss something along the way."
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:47 PM Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 12:12 -0400, John Levine wrote: > > > > There are perfectly good reasons to use v6: no NAT in front of your > > devices, > > Check. > > > every service gets its own IP, > > Roger. > > > better connections to devices > > on mobile networks and home networks that are behind v4 NATs. > > Bingo! > > All very good reasons, and in fact every one of them are my primary > reasons. > > But the came I am making is to PHBs, not engineers and I am trying to > find a path of least resistance. > > b. > >
