On 9/Jul/19 16:01, Tom Beecher wrote: > > > But if that language was inserted into the contracts, and you can > demonstrably prove it's not being done, enforcing contract terms > should always be done. Depending on the strength of the remedy, could > have been a lot of free service, enough financial incentive for them > to MAKE it work correctly, or leverage to open renegotiations for more > favorable terms for you. Perhaps plenty of service credits. Anything else would just burn too much time on either end for no practical outcome. Mark.
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 cyrus ramirez via NANOG
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Robert Webb
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Ross Tajvar
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joel Jaeggli
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jay Ford
- Re: QoS for Office365 Paul Thornton
- Re: QoS for Office365 Brian Knight
- Re: QoS for Office365 Saku Ytti