On 8/Aug/19 06:46, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> If you don't require redundant routing engines, there is nothing from > Juniper that will cost less and have the capacity you require. In > fact, there really aren't any cheaper MX options at all, other than > the kneecapped MX80 and MX104 variants. MX204 is really a nice box. I > only wish they had a redundant version. The MX80 and MX104 have no business being in any modern conversation these days :-). For what you could do with it, the MX204 is pretty neat. Juniper have never really considered the Metro in a serious way, because if they did, they'd have an MX204-1G (if you can call it that). They've lost plenty of ground to Cisco's ASR920 (and older MX3600X) on the back of this. Mark.
