----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen Satchell" <l...@satchell.net>
> On 10/3/19 10:13 PM, Fred Baker wrote: >> There is one thing in 1122/1123 and 1812 that is not in those kinds >> of documents that I miss; that is essentially "why". Going through >> 1122/1123 and 1812, you'll ind several sections that say "we require >> X", and follow that with a "discussion" section that says "we thought >> about X, Y, and Z, there were proponents of each, the arguments were >> X', Y', and Z', and we chose X for this reason". I would presume that >> what you're really looking for in a 1812-for-IPv6 is not "we require >> X" as much as "for this reason". Correct me if I'm wrong. > > Ah. What I'm looking for is a list of check-boxes to include in an > implementation specification for an edge router. It can be references > to a whole bunch of RFCs and "packaged" as a BCP. The discussions you > describe are better in the individual papers. Is that a good time for me to point to the URL in my sig? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274