On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:31 PM Masataka Ohta < [email protected]> wrote:
> William Herrin wrote: > > > I was out to prove a point. I needed a technique that, at least in > theory, > > would start working as a result of software upgrades alone, needing no > > configuration changes or other operator intervention. > > I think TCPng/UDPng with 32/48 bit port numbers combined with NAT/A+P, > which is obviously fully operational with existing IPv4 backbone, is > better. Not a fan of port numbers. If we're going to replace TCP and UDP, initiate the link with a name (e.g. dns name), negotiate a connection ID and continue with the connection ID. No ports, no port scanning. QUIC comes pretty close to getting it right. -Bill -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/
