Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of addresses but also minimize covered addresses that are not part of the mandatory set?
Tony > On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> >> your aim is to get to maximum aggregation .. with some overage, like >> 90% of a /24 ? >> so missing like 25 addresses in a whole /24.. (for instance) > > I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc... > > This is not punitive, its about scale. > > Joe >
