It could measure the extent of the problem and would be within what I
suggested.
For example if there were only one AS being abused that would make it
a different priority than 1,000 or 10,000 (some seem to be implying a
number like that) being abused.
Do we have that number?
And tracking the trend.
On February 6, 2020 at 14:50 sa...@tislabs.com (Sandra Murphy) wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 6, 2020, at 2:38 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would likely be a lot better than "someone on NANOG noticed a
> > discrepancy let's shout at each other about it for a few days."
>
>
> Did I miss something? I thought the discrepancy being pointed out was that
> resources that were not currently allocated/assigned were still being
> actively used and actively accepted by people who should have rejected them.
> Private address space and private ASNs are one case, resources that have
> not yet been allocated or were once allocated and have been reclaimed are
> another.
>
> An accounting audit of ARIN resource management process is not going to help
> the fact that people are accepting routes they should not be accepting.
>
> I suspect I did miss something.
>
> —Sandy
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
