Confluence is good for small teams. Self-hosted is $10r. Plus addons we end up around $150/yr. Unfortunately, we outgrew it in terms of users. Additional users are way too expensive.
[OIT Website]<https://www.oit.co/> Ray Orsini Chief Executive Officer OIT, LLC [cid:[email protected]] 305.967.6756 x1009<tel:305.967.6756%20x1009> | [cid:[email protected]] 305.571.6272<fax:305.571.6272> [cid:[email protected]] [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | [cid:[email protected]]<https://www.oit.co/> www.oit.co<https://www.oit.co/> [cid:[email protected]] oit.co/ray [Facebook]<https://go.oit.co/facebook> [LinkedIn]<https://go.oit.co/linkedin> [Twitter]<https://go.oit.co/twitter> [YouTube]<https://go.oit.co/youtube> How are we doing? We'd love to hear your feedback. https://go.oit.co/review From: NANOG <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Craig Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2020 11:34 AM To: Nicholas Oas <[email protected]>; nanog group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: WIKI documentation Software? Lol, Sharepoint,,,. Arggg, yea NOT going to happen , We’ve managed to avoid using that. On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:50 AM Nicholas Oas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Seconding Confluence. Stay away from Sharepoint. On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 8:09 AM Craig <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Wanted to ask what WIKI software teams are using to save documentation to / how to's for staff, etc. pro's con's We have an older wiki bare-metal wiki server, that I want to get replaced before it kicks the bucket and was looking into various ones. thanks; CPV
