> On May 1, 2020, at 1:56 PM, james jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't know if this feasible, I would rather see the ORG TLD in the hands of 
> a nonprofit. That is just a personal feeling. I don't how practical that 
> would be though.

That was, right up until the very last moment, a hard requirement in the 2002 
criteria.  Feverish eleventh-hour work by beltway lobbyists got that 
restriction removed, last time.  It doesn’t need to be removed this time.

                                -Bill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to