LACP+tagged VLANs is not a problem for me on RouterOS. I'm not wasting my time on SwOS.
In general, Mikrotik's L2 switching implementation is very frustrating, but I think it's gotten a bit better on the CRS3XX series of switches. On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:53 PM Randy Carpenter <rcar...@network1.net> wrote: > > I could never get LACP + tagged VLANs to work on SwOS. > > Then again, it doesn't work reliably on RouterOS either, so I gave up. > Spending more on hardware that is well supported is worth it versus my time > and sanity. > > I think Ubiquiti pretty much has the "cheap hardware that works well, but > commercial support lacking" market cornered. > > thanks, > -Randy > > ----- On May 18, 2020, at 5:43 PM, nanog <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > Yep, run SwichOS, prevents you from running things in software. š > > > > > > *[image: LTI-Full_175px]* > > > *Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, > MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified * > > Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Editionā > > *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services > > *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net > > Create Wireless Coverageās with www.towercoverage.com > > > > *From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2020 4:37 PM > *To:* Mauro Gasparini <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+ > > > > That's a downfall of Mikrotik, they give you ultimate power. You can do > some pretty atypical things on there. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > <https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ics%2dil.com&umid=B47E9451-A5F3-0D05-8BDE-9FDBD4B4C161&auth=079c058f437b7c6303d36c6513e5e8848d0c5ac4-285b59a47041a35803b05fa3a991e89443b374c5> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Mauro Gasparini" <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > *To: *nanog@nanog.org > *Sent: *Monday, May 18, 2020 1:45:59 PM > *Subject: *Re: Switch for SFP+ > > It's clear then that I must use "bridge vlan" to achieve the goal I am > looking for. > Now it's time for me to study, research and test on my side. > If I have any specific questions, I will draw on your experience. > Thanks a lot. > > El 15/5/20 a las 22:11, Travis Garrison escribiĆ³: > > On the CRS 3xx line, use vlan filtering instead. This guarantees hardware > offloading. > > > > PS. Do not use this method on the 1xx or 2xx lines. > > > > /interface bonding > add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8 > transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3 > > > > /interface bridge > > add name=bridge vlan-filtering=yes > > > > /interface bridge port > > add bridge=bridge interface=bond-inet > > add bridge=bridge interface=sfp1 > > > > /interface bridge vlan > > add bridge=bridge tagged=bond-inet,sfp1 vlan-ids=201 > > > > Thanks > > Travis > > > > *From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> *On > Behalf Of *Mauro Gasparini > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2020 10:55 AM > *To:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+ > > > > This works well on my CRSs: > > /interface bonding > add mode=802.3ad name=bond-inet slaves=ether9,ether10,ether8 > transmit-hash-policy=layer-2-and-3 > > /interface bridge port > add bridge=br-cabase interface=bond-inet > add bridge=br-cabase interface=sfp1 > > But if I want to bridge vlans behind some bonding Instead of bridging phy > interfaces, cpu explodes: > > /interface vlan > add name=vl201-mmen vlan-id=201 interface=sfp1 > add name=vl201-mment vlan-id=201 interface=bond-inet > > /interface bridge port > add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mmen > add bridge=br-mment interface=vl201-mment > > El 15/5/20 a las 12:06, Mike Hammett escribiĆ³: > > https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS3xx_series_switches#Bonding > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > <https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ics%2dil.com&umid=B47E9451-A5F3-0D05-8BDE-9FDBD4B4C161&auth=079c058f437b7c6303d36c6513e5e8848d0c5ac4-285b59a47041a35803b05fa3a991e89443b374c5> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Mauro Gasparini" <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > *To: *nanog@nanog.org > *Sent: *Friday, May 15, 2020 8:55:22 AM > *Subject: *Re: Switch for SFP+ > > Thanks. I am currently using CRS326-24G-2S+ (with routerOS) for this, but > when I want to do vlan trunking through the bonding, cpu load grows from 3% > to more than 90%. > I'm consulting Mikrotik's support in the meantime, because routerOS > probably doesn't take advantage of the switch hardware as swOS would. > > El 15/5/20 a las 10:03, Alain Hebert escribiĆ³: > > Hi, > > Mikrotik is a decent product and I'm always amazed at their features > set, but... > > Using the UI to configuring the switch will punt too much traffic > toward the CPU. However, it is possible to configure the switch fabric > with the cli and attain the desired results. > > It does not compare to a JNP QFX5100 or a Extreme Network x650, > x670... etc. > > ----- > > Alain Hebert aheb...@pubnix.net > > PubNIX Inc. > > 50 boul. St-Charles > > P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 > > Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 > > On 2020-05-14 15:11, Adam Thompson wrote: > > Have you actually looked at Mikrotik switches? I don't like the OS, but > the hardware does what you want it to. > > > https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r={%22sfp_plus_interface%22:{%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22}}#! > <https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r=%7b%22sfp_plus_interface%22:%7b%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22%7d%7d#!> > > If necessary, buy your SFP modules from FS.com and get them coded as > Mikrotik modules at the factory - that's what we do for Cisco, Brocade, > Juniper, Extreme, etc. > > Even the top-of-the-line Mikrotik only costs US$899. > > -Adam > > > > *Adam Thompson* > Consultant, Infrastructure Services > [image: [MERLIN LOGO]] > 100 - 135 Innovation Drive > Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8 > (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) > athomp...@merlin.mb.ca > www.merlin.mb.ca > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> on > behalf of Mauro Gasparini <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 8:46:21 AM > *To:* Mehmet Akcin > *Cc:* nanog > *Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+ > > > > Thank you. The problem is that to get a price lower than U$D 3000 I have > to resort to a used device. > > El 14/5/20 a las 01:08, Mehmet Akcin escribiĆ³: > > Used Juniper QFX5100-48T will do it. Probably overkill but you can grab > one cheap @ebay > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 16:36 Mauro Gasparini <mjgaspar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Good afternoon. > > I'm looking for a switch with the following capabilities: > . transport for more than 20 gbps > . link aggregation LACP > . slots for SFP+ > . seamlessly when trunking vlans through the link aggregation. > > And essentially that doesn't exceed US$D 2000 and is compatible with > 10GBASE-ER and/or 10GBASE-ZR modules that are not from the vendor itself > (e.g. SPFs: Huawei, Mikrotik, Sumitomo, OEMs). > > If any of you have a good experience with a device that meets these > requirements (which are minimal with the exception of price and > compatibility) ? > > Regards. > Mauro Gasparini > > -- > > Mehmet > +1-424-298-1903 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >