(re-adding Adam's text that didn't get quoted, but matters) On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 13:49:56 +0300, Saku Ytti said: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:46, Radu-Adrian Feurdean > <na...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020, at 00:09, Adam Thompson wrote: > > > Good luck with tunnelling LACP, no matter what boxes you have - LACP > > > has (de facto) hard jitter requirements of under 1msec, or you'll be > > > getting TCP resets coming out your ears due to mis-ordered packets. > > Errr.... sorry, but at the latest news, TCP was supposed to handle out of > > order packets and reorder them before sending them to upper layer. > Yes, however new reno and the like are tuned for practical Internet. > Practical Internet has lot more packet loss than reordering, so TCP > algorithm considers any amount of reordering a packet loss, causing an > immediate resend, destroying your performance.
There's a difference between a TCP *resend*, and a *RESET*. Triggering a resend on a re-order is reasonably sane, sending an RST isn't....
pgpP8nAK8OtkD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
