Well luckily we have MEF to set expectations about ones EPL/EVPL/EPLAN/EVPLAN performance. (and formal SLA contracts describing every single aspect of the service and its performance).
Anyways, when I was designing these the back in the days when it was cool and demand was high, customers (other carriers) were getting MTU9100 (to fit customers MTU9000), the whole CFM & LFM shebang (to the point made earlier in the thread that the link should go down on both ends -like it’s the case with a wave) and sub 50ms convergence in case something when wrong inside our backbone. We as a provider got more $$$ from single investment to our wave/fiber, but our customers could enjoy p2p links on par with wave for less $. adam From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+adamv0025=netconsultings....@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 10:50 AM To: Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: BFD for long haul circuit > Unfortunately not. Fortunately .... very fortunately Mark. L2VPNs running on someone's IP backbone sold by many as "circuits" has many issues ... stability, MTU blackhols, random drops - and that is pretty much the same all over the world :( Very unfortunate technology just to mux more users and get more $$$ from single investment. Cheers, R. On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.com <mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.com> > wrote: On 17/Jul/20 02:37, Harivishnu Abhilash wrote: Thanks for the update. You have any backhauls, that is running over an L2 xconnect ? I’m facing issue only on the backhaul link over a l2vpn ckt. Unfortunately not. All our backbones are either over dark fibre or EoDWDM. Mark.
