On 25/Aug/20 22:40, Brian Johnson wrote: > I usually solve this problem by designing for NAT444 and dual-stack. This > solves both problems and allows for users to migrate as they are able/need > to. If you try and force the change, you will loose users. At some point, you run out of IPv4. You could cascade to a high degree of NAT444, but then it gets hairy, and costly, at some point. Mark.
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help Mike Hammett
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka