This is why we wrote RFC8585, so users can freely buy their own router ...

The ISP can also list some of the compatible models in case they are using 
"additional" features.
 
 

El 25/8/20 22:16, "NANOG en nombre de Brandon Martin" 
<[email protected] en nombre de 
[email protected]> escribió:

    On 8/25/20 3:38 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
    > This is very common in many countries and not related to IPv6, but 
    > because many operators have special configs or features in the CPEs they 
    > provide.

    I really, really hate to force users to use my network edge router (I 
    provide the ONT, though, and I provide an edge router that works and 
    most users do take it), but it can be tough to ensure users have 
    something that supports all the right modern features and can be 
    configured via standard means.

    It would be nice if the consumer router industry could get its 
    collective act together and at least come up with some easy-ish to 
    understand feature support table that customers can match up with their 
    service provider's list of needs.  The status quo of a list of devices 
    that work right (which is of course often staggeringly short if you're 
    doing any of these modern transition mechanisms) that needs constant 
    updating and may not be easily available is not ideal.

    Heck just having a real, complete list of supported features on the 
    model support page on their website would be an improvement...
    -- 
    Brandon Martin



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.



Reply via email to