I second Jeff in using YANG. On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:37 PM Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> wrote:
> YANG is the right direction. > OpenConfig BGP and policy models are supported by every vendor on the > earth. > We are finalizing IETF BGP and policy models > draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model is about to be last-called > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model is pretty much ready > > Cheers, > Jeff > On Nov 5, 2020, 4:57 AM -0800, Douglas Fischer <[email protected]>, > wrote: > > I'm designing a tool for provisioning configurations for an ITP and his > Peers. > The idea is that based on that, all the configs to all the involved > components configurations to be deployed based on that source of data. I'm > Talking about Routers, BMP, SNMP tool(Ex.: Zabbix), etc... > > But, once again, I'm feeling that I'm reinventing the wheel. > I'm pretty sure that someone else has already suffered from that. > > I search for a bit, and I didn't find anything... > But with this gray area between developers and network operators, I'm not > sure if I'm looking at the right place. > > I even tried to look at http://schema.org but didn't find anything > related to networks and BGP there yet. > > > So, anyone could point me in the right direction? > -- > Douglas Fernando Fischer > Engº de Controle e Automação > >
