First, take a look at this:

https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894


Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools):

https://bgp.he.net/AS18894

https://stat.ripe.net/18894

The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have no
correlation with reality in global v4/v6 BGP tables.

It is also noteworthy that I have inquired with a number of persons I know
who are active in network engineering in NYC, and nobody has ever
encountered this company.

Reply via email to