I would say that under normal circumstances, 45 days might work (Personally, I would prefer 90 days).
However, I suggest we are not dealing with a normal circumstance because of the fall out from the winter incident. On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:35 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote: > > > On 4/14/21 18:03, Stan Barber wrote: > > > I would suggest that the regulation paradigm in Texas does not allow > > coordinated maintenance scheduling to adapt to supply and load issues > > (especially in the face of a disaster like the Winter event earlier > > this year). That would mean a stronger regulatory framework and that > > smacks of government interference in the eyes of some. > > 45 days of planned notice, is what I read. And can be rejected if that > notification window is shorter than that. > > Is that sufficient? > > Mark. >
