Honestly good call and we’re looking at raising funds to do exactly that - 
however some of these buildings have values near a billion dollars each and 
there is more money in commercial real estate than telecom.

In my experience these things tend to crop-up with ownership of the building 
being a lot newer than the telco’s presence.   at $dayjob I’ve seen it 
personally - "MPOE access denied, you don’t have an agreement with the RMC”  
then we produce an agreement (with us) that pre-dates the RMC’s agreement.  We 
can find the docs, but not every telco has every document from generations ago 
in some cases.

I’ve found in almost every business, there is a much greater efficiency 
presumed than realized.   Since I was a child I’ve felt that automation could 
fix this.

—L.B.

Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC 
CEO 
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the 
world.”
FCC License KJ6FJJ



> On Sep 22, 2021, at 8:49 PM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 9/22/21 6:12 PM, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
>> If someone were to make us remove a redundant DWDM node, we’d charge them 
>> list price to ever consider putting it back*, plus a deposit, plus our costs 
>> for the removal in the first place.  Bad move.  Enjoy the $8million, it 
>> could cost more than that to undo this mistake.
>> *you’d actually never ever get it back in the form you’d want. We’ll never 
>> trust the site again and won’t place critical infrastructure there, we’d 
>> only build back what’s needed to serve the use.
> 
> 
> 
> Buy the building then. Owners change and some are more friendly than others. 
> Why would someone ever place critical infrastructure at a site without a 
> solid agreement that prohibits removal, or at least making them whole 
> financially so they don't have to take it out on the next person that comes 
> along? I'd hate to be the poor customer that gets treated as lesser class 
> because a previous owner caused hurt feelings.

Reply via email to