> On Oct 29, 2021, at 6:55 PM, Denis Fondras <[email protected]> wrote: > Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit : >> If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just >> the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include each >> of the peer ASNs on the other side of the route-server. Either way is fine. > > I have an agreement with the RS owner (IXP) but not with each participant. > Should the contractual relationship be true or false ?
Sorry, we should have been more clear about that… This is just whether a
bilateral contract exists between the two peering ASes.
We’re looking at multilateral agreements separately, because two ASes may peer
directly in some locations and via multilateral route-servers elsewhere.
So with that question we just want to know whether there’s a bilateral contract.
Thanks,
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
