Implementing IPv6 reduces costs for CGNAT. You will have (twice?) less
traffic flow through CGNAT, so cheaper hardware and less IPv4 address
space. Isn't it?
22.10.21 20:19, Mark Tinka пише:
On 10/22/21 18:08, t...@pelican.org wrote:
I don't think it'll ever make money, but I think it will reduce
costs. CGNAT boxes cost money, operating them costs money, dealing
with the support fallout from them costs money. Especially in the
residential space, where essentially if the customer calls you, ever,
you just blew years' worth of margin.
The problem is accurately modelling cost reduction using native IPv6 in
lieu of CG-NAT is hard when the folk that need convincing are the CFO's.
They are more used to "spend 1 to get 2". Convincing them to "save 2 by
spending 1" - not as easy as one may think.
Mark.
