On 6 Dec 2021, at 2:07 PM, Owen DeLong 
<o...@delong.com<mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2021, at 9:03 AM, John Curran 
<jcur...@arin.net<mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote:

Owen -

The RSA and LRSA agreements are identical, however, it is true that you would 
lose legacy holder resource status (for those IPv4 resources issued to you 
before ARIN’s formation) if you consolidate to a single Org with one bill under 
the RSA.

I see no difference in the status of legacy holder resources vs. resources.

I care not about that.

However, there is (to some extent) a limit on how badly the board can elect to 
screw me financially year over year in the LRSA which simply does not exist in 
the RSA. To claim that an agreement which limits my fee increases year over 
year to $25 is identical to an agreement which has no cap on fee increases is 
ludicrous at best, and certainly a bit disingenuous, if not worse.

Owen -

If you value the $25 per year cap in fee change, then feel free maintain a 
separate LRSA for your legacy resource services. If you’d prefer to consolidate 
under a single RSA and pay a single fee based on the larger IPv4 or IPv6 
category based on total holdings in each, that’s also available to you – the 
choice is yours.  If you choose to consolidate, then you will indeed have to 
pay the same fees as everyone else – even if a hypothecated future change to 
the fee schedule for that service category is greater than $25 annual.  If you 
consider paying the same fee as other ARIN customers for your legacy resource 
services to be a form of hardship, then maintain a separate LRSA agreement for 
them if you wish,

Back to the question raised in the original post:  organizations that just have 
ARIN IPv4 number resources can obtain a corresponding-sized IPv6 block without 
increasing their registration services category and corresponding ARIN annual 
fee.

Please direct followups on ARIN fee structure back to the ARIN-ppml mailing 
list as this thread is wandering far afield from the issue raised by the 
original post.

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers




Reply via email to