The thing is aviation DOESN’T own this spectrum, they just assumed it would 
always be unused. And they failed to mention it would be a problem during the 
last 5 years of discussion regarding the use of this spectrum.

Shane

> On Jan 18, 2022, at 4:25 PM, Mel Beckman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Michael,
> 
> Here’s a recent PCmag editorial on the subject, and it seems like many people 
> want to put Internet speed above airline safety:
> 
> https://www.pcmag.com/news/faa-goes-in-hard-to-kill-mid-band-5g
> 
> This issue definitely impacts network operations for 5G providers, so makes 
> sense to discuss here.
> 
> Here’s a comment from a friend of mine who has been both a network engineer 
> and a pilot for United Airlines, posted on the article linked above:
> 
> “As a pilot, I can tell you that landing in instrument conditions is by far 
> the most critical flight regime possible, during which the radar altimeter 
> reports are a matter of life and death. There is no alternative technology, 
> such as GPS, with the required accuracy and reliability, to provide approach 
> guidance down to the runway in zero-zero weather, which is what the radar 
> altimeter does. 
> 
> The collective tech industry needs to admit that it made a huge blunder when 
> it urged the FCC’s clueless Ajit Pai to “blow off” the clearly demonstrated 
> FAA spectrum conflict. Sorry, passengers, but if you look out your window, 
> you’ll see that aviation owns this spectrum and is entitled to 
> interference-free operation. Replacing all radar altimeters isn’t going to 
> happen in time for 5G anyway — it took more than ten years just to deploy 
> anti-collision technology. So do what you should have done from the 
> beginning: follow the FCC rules of non-interference to existing users, who 
> have clear priority in this case.”
> 
> I tend to agree with him, and it looks like the 5G providers and FAA agreed 
> last week to put some buffer safety zones around runway approaches at 50 
> major airports:
> 
> https://www.cnet.com/news/faa-lists-50-airports-getting-temporary-buffer-zones-blocking-new-5g-signals/
> 
> 
> -mel 
> 
>>> On Jan 18, 2022, at 12:33 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> I really don't know anything about it. It seems really late to be having 
>> this fight now, right?
>> 
>> Mike
>> 

Reply via email to