Meraki MX series? I don't like the way they do their licensing (your license runs out, the box is a paper-weight) but they do really well at establishing site-to-site VPNs in some pretty challenging scenarios. Dynamic IPs and NATs don't really cause them a problem. Some CGNats do (AT&T I'm looking at you). Shawn -----Original Message----- From: "Keith Stokes" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 1:11pm To: "William Herrin" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: VPN recommendations?
Pfsense on Netgate appliances? I’ve used several of them, while not for this exact purpose they have done the roles but maybe not the amount of VPN traffic. -- Keith Stokes SalonBiz, Inc On Feb 10, 2022, at 12:02 PM, William Herrin <[ [email protected] ]( mailto:[email protected] )> wrote: Hi folks, Do you have any recommendations for VPN appliances? Specifically: I need to build a site to site VPNs at speeds between 100mpbs and 1 gbit where all but one of the sites are behind an IPv4 NAT gateway with dynamic public IP addresses. Normally I'd throw OpenVPN on a couple of Linux boxes and be happy but my customer insists on a network appliance. Site to site VPNs using IPSec and static IP addresses on the plaintext side are a dime a dozen but traversing NAT and dynamic IP addresses (and automatically re-establishing when the service goes out and comes back up with different addresses) is a hard requirement. Thanks in advance, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [ [email protected] ]( mailto:[email protected] )[ ]( https://bill.herrin.us/ ) [ https://bill.herrin.us/ ]( https://bill.herrin.us/ )
