Again, aside from turning off the ICANN-operated root servers (which would be pointless), the remainder of the requests from the UA Government Advisory Committee member are not something ICANN could/would do unilaterally regardless of the validity of the justification.
Regards, -drc > On Mar 1, 2022, at 4:00 PM, virendra rode <virendra.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I concur, this is an extremely dangerous slippery slope that ICANN should > refrain. There’s the possibility for misfires, misattribution and > miscalculation that could backfire which is extremely concerning. > > — > regards, > /vrode > >> On Mar 1, 2022, at 00:56, Matthew Petach <mpet...@netflight.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 12:19 AM George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com >> <mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Posted by Bill Woodcock on Twitter… >> https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21 >> <https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21> >> >> https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS <https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS> >> >> Ukraine (I think I read as) want ICANN to turn root nameservers off, revoke >> address delegations, and turn off TLDs for Russia. >> >> Seems… instability creating… >> >> -george >> >> >> Information sharing should increase during wartime, not decrease. >> >> Restricting information is more often the playbook of authoritarian regimes, >> and not something we should generally support. >> >> Besides, GhostWriter is based out of Belarus, not Russia proper. ^_^; >> https://www.wired.com/story/ghostwriter-hackers-belarus-russia-misinformationo/ >> >> <https://www.wired.com/story/ghostwriter-hackers-belarus-russia-misinformationo/> >> >> Matt >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
