On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:47:00 -0700, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: I'd really like to understand what the requirements that are specific to v6 are that make it so much harder or bloated. Not product availability, but actual things that make it difficult to deploy. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's all in the nanog archives. Just the amount of grumping by network operators to finally get DHCPv6 was pretty tremendous. Basically, folks were shouting "we want it whether you think we need it or not!" Of course, that's just the start. This thread itself has a lot of the iceberg tops. scott
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
- Re: V6 still not supported borg
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Beecher
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported borg
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via NANOG
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported Nathan Angelacos
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported surfer
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
- Re: V6 still not supported Masataka Ohta
- Re: V6 still not supported John Curran
- Re: V6 still not supported Randy Bush
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas
- Re: V6 still not supported Christopher Morrow
- Re: V6 still not supported Michael Thomas