On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 12:48, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hey, > I do not share that view: I'm not sure how you read my view. I was not attempting to communicate anything negative of IPv6. What I attempted to communicate - near future looks to improve IOT security posture significantly, as the IOT LAN won't share network with your user LAN, you'll go via GW - thread+matter gives me optimism that IOT is being taken seriously and good progress is being made, and the standards look largely well thought out > 1) Thread uses 6LoWPAN so nodes are effectively IPv6 even though it doesn’t > show in the air. I believe I implied that strongly. Considering the 'forced marketing of IPv6' on the thread addressing scheme. Mind you, I don't think it is big deal, might even be positive, but I would have probably used inline PDU to decide roles. -- ++ytti
